Thank you, David Wong and Miri Mogilevsky!

A girlfriend tipped me off to David Wong’s really amusing and spot-on 101 on why social justice (particularly regarding structural racism and sexism) is not about white guilt but about fixing what our ancestors broke. Check out 5 Helpful Answers to Society’s Most Uncomfortable Questions to see what I mean (and yes, this is impressively educational and insightful for an article at Cracked!). That’s really elegantly written. Funny. Apt. And a much needed summary of what many of us take for granted but find hard to explain so well. Required reading for anyone who doesn’t already get it (but wants to), and rewarding reading for anyone who already does!

As it happens, just by chance, Miri Mogilevsky also published a really excellent article at DailyDot about the “Over-Sensitivity” Backlash, that’s also funny and spot-on, explaining why the new hyperbole against a mostly mythical political correctness is really a cloak for not wanting to face the fact that behavior we lazily take for granted can actually be hurting people. Also, courtesy is actually a virtue, not something to rant against. Her focus is the use of the “trigger warning,” something, I should point out, TV shows and movies have carried versions of for ages (and no one flipped their lid about the idea until now…yet everyone flipping their lid still doesn’t even notice they precede television shows and movies!). But PZ Myers also added a really good appendix of his own experiences with using them, and how normal and not in fact novel they are. Mogilevsky then added a follow-up that illustrates the worst that comes from using them (spoiler: nothing).

My own practice is to either use explicit trigger warnings when something really bad is coming (as when in my post about Boghossian and Molyneux I warned people how disturbing the content of Molyneux’s misogynistic rant was before they clicked to hear it or read a blocked transcript of it) or to build warnings into the titles or first paragraphs of my articles, without using the words “trigger” or “warning,” the title or first paragraph will nevertheless make inferentially clear what disturbing topics will be discussed in the article. The courtesy pays dividends in all the ways Mogilevsky documents. Without looking weird or disrupting anything. Either way, trigger warnings are a helpful skill in media and teaching to aim for. I don’t always master it. But the more aware I am, the better I do.

It’s just etiquette. Etiquette that makes the world better. So don’t get your knickerbockers in a twist over it.

Discover more from Richard Carrier Blogs

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading