Comments on: Appearing at UCLA Next Week!

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:29:15 +0000

In reply to NK. I believe Goodacre even introduced the argument. It's in his seminal work on Q (based on his earlier peer reviewed article: "Fatigue in the Synoptics," NTS 44 [1998], pp. 45-58). I can't recall if the evidence has been extended by anyone. (Or even rebutted.) I hadn't regarded it as his strongest argument.

By: NK

NK — Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:33:41 +0000

“Has anybody written analysis about Matthew’s copyist fatigue?”

Richard Carrier on April 18, 2016 at 4:39 pm:
“You mean apart from Mark Goodacre?”

Well, I guess I mean including him. Where has he written about that anf has someone else written about the subject? If so, where?

By: Dave Barnard

Dave Barnard — Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:24:43 +0000

Richard , you do realise that you can make an absolute shit load of cash if you do the following on your road trip :
1. When no one is looking , claim Jesus Christ appeared to you.
2. Claim he made you blind and then pay off some doctor to confirm your blindness
3. Hide from the public for about a week
4. Resurface a born again Christian and sell this off to the masses in books and television interviews.

If you’re keen , I’ll be your agent and stage the “Pauline Encounter” . I know you have a conscience and may think this is unethical , but we will be selling hope to millions . Nothing like a bit of religious placebo to secure an early retirement.

Cheers
Dave

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:06:13 +0000

In reply to Alif. Yes. I'll write a post analysis. Eventually.

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:05:17 +0000

In reply to Tom. Ridiculously long rants by an anti-feminist with Gamergate sympathies who hasn't read anything else on polyamory and has no idea what he is talking about? I have better things to do with my time.

By: Alif

Alif — Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:31:41 +0000

Kenneshaw….interesting? : Any standalone post-debate analysis, Dr Carrier- as you’v done befor?
All mythicists are not the same…the same wud apply in the convurs ie neither are all historicists the same? so Evans v Horn?
Seems tumblweeds are playing, which is eery – I’v only seen wun report, from ‘dustin martyr’.

Cheers.

By: Tom

Tom — Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:38:33 +0000

I’d like to see your take on these critiques of your posts on polyamory:
https://verbosestoic.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/richard-carrier-and-logic-and-polyamory/
and:
https://verbosestoic.wordpress.com/2016/04/11/poly-rationalization/