Comments on: The Richard Carrier Exists Tour: Stop 3, Denver!

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Thu, 12 May 2016 00:40:48 +0000

In reply to vincitomniaveritas. Don't be cagey. Answer the question. Do you renounce God? (This should not be a hard question for an honest person to answer.)

By: vincitomniaveritas

vincitomniaveritas — Wed, 11 May 2016 00:15:43 +0000

What ? I am discussing the likely historicity of Jesus. God’s existence isn’t being discussed here.

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Tue, 10 May 2016 22:11:55 +0000

In reply to vincitomniaveritas. Oh, I see, you are declaring God does not exist?

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Tue, 10 May 2016 22:03:12 +0000

In reply to Greg Rhodes. Why?

By: Richard Carrier

Richard Carrier — Tue, 10 May 2016 22:02:30 +0000

In reply to moarscienceplz.

In California they steal the wires inside street lights.

That, as a pedestrian and vehicular safety issue, probably causes harm or death.

Columbus wins the contest.

By: vincitomniaveritas

vincitomniaveritas — Tue, 10 May 2016 19:20:18 +0000

“You mean, all I do is refer to the book, a work of peer reviewed scholarship by a qualified expert that documents six years of dedicated research, that you claimed to have read and claimed did not say the things in fact it does? In other words, all I did was prove you are a liar and that the book does address everything you said it didn’t?
That’s your complaint?
Seriously.
Think this through.
You have only two options: continue being a liar before Your God; or read the fucking book.
Complaining that those are your only two options, amounts to choosing the first of them.”

Who said anything about God ? You don’t know what I may believe or may not believe. I’m not discussing this. I’m discussing the very probable existence of either Jesus or a person he is based upon.You then again repeat another libelous and petty accusation that I’m simply “a liar”. I laid out specifically the evidence and the arguments which strongly favour Jesus’ historical existence which OHJ fails to SUFFICIENTLY address. OHJ discusses much of the evidence I mentioned, but not all of it, and certainly not the arguments or the reasoning. This is why I’m attempting to discuss this with you. However, you do not address these contentions themselves because you again are unwilling to do so for some reason.

By: Greg Rhodes

Greg Rhodes — Mon, 09 May 2016 22:09:06 +0000

You may have trouble finding any Glenmorangie scotch at this brewery..!!! Lol

By: moarscienceplz

moarscienceplz — Mon, 09 May 2016 19:30:43 +0000

Looks like you made a mistake choosing Columbus, Richard. Now you'll have to stay home all the time and guard your toilet!

By: Dave Barnard

Dave Barnard — Mon, 09 May 2016 11:50:03 +0000

Hi Richard

I love it. It reminds me a bit of those old school evangelists who would load their family up into the camper and hit the high road to spread gods word. “god will provide Richard” – “god will provide”.

You know religion is BS when an atheist who is a well known magician and illusionist can convert a staunch Atheist who also happens to be a stem cell researcher and well qualified scientist into a Christian . An atheist converting an atheist into a Christian — ahh man, that’s wicked. .. Here’s the linked . Watch how she just breaks down as Jesus comes into her life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51B8MzcxOX0