I get a kick out of the way that apologist Christians default to, “No it isn’t!” or “Yes it is!” when they can’t think of anything better to say. It just shows how terribly afraid they are of being wrong!

So I’ve seen the words exegeses and eisegeses but never quit knew what they meant, so just now I looked them up, which isn’t a difficult thing to do. My suspicion, however, is that the person or persons that you are addressing don’t have a clue as to what they mean and won’t bother to look them up. But just to be fair, even if they do, I seriously doubt that they will get it.

I concur!

The issue is what the prophecy says (and does not say). Not whether it was a prophecy.

No this argument began with someone saying Isaiah was just pointing at an already Pregnant Woman.

Those two sentences are saying literally the same fucking thing.

I think you have failed to grasp what the prophecy is. Because you don’t know anything about Hebrew and amateurishly misinterpreted what the prophecy says. Exactly as we have explained several times now. Maybe eventually you’ll get it. But, I dunno, you do not seem to be showing any signs of possessing the requisite competence to get it. So I won’t hold my breath.

No this argument began with someone saying Isaiah was just pointing at an already Pregnant Woman.

That’s neither here nor there. The issue is what the prophecy says (and does not say). Not whether it was a prophecy.

Present and Past Tense Language is used in Prophecies all the time, that doesn’t prove it isn’t a Prophecy.