There are a lot of good YouTube analyses of that disaster. But it does really represent his decline now. He can’t defend anything. Or even explain what it is he wants to defend.

“You’re really quite nothing.”

This is so crystal clearly said I don’t know how people still fail to see what Dr. Carrier is saying here.

As usual, you have distorted the facts (the Tavistock standards of care were objectively poor; which is why only this clinic is getting this result; and there are a ton more sources here than just “NYT and Guardian” articles, including actual experts on diverse subjects, detailed documentation, and even critics sympathetic to Peterson).

And your logic sucks (one negligent hospital does not equal all hospitals are negligent; “I don’t like the Guardian, therefore all sources that disagree with me are wrong, and I don’t have to address any facts even documented in the Guardian“; and other like travesties of reasoning).

Meanwhile, that being the only example you gave of something I said “unravelling” (even though I never said anything pertaining to this; for example, I did not say there would never be any negligent clinics serving any particular community poorly who therefore need closing or reform; and even though this isolated incident doesn’t even support your generalization), your claim that “many” of the things I said are “unraveling” is typical bullshit from Peterson fans, just as I documented.

You don’t check facts. Your contact with reality is poor. And you suck at rational thought. All you have is feelings—an emotional attachment to an ideology, rather than a commitment to understand reality. Just like Young Earth Creationists and Flat Earthers.

This is a problem. You really need to see to it.

Turns out Peterson’s predictions on the trans issue regarding sex changes are bang on.

Thousands from the Tavistock clinic and the NHS suing after sex changes. It turns out there wasn’t enough long term evidence to initiate any of these programs. Too late for the thousands of lives ruined by the treatment, but Peterson was the right wing pseudo intellectual who shouldn’t be listened to.

Many of the arguments in your article have unraveled a few years later. Pretty much a copy and paste job of the NYT and Guardian articles on Peterson, who incidentally are distancing themselves from the self indulgence.

You must have missed the point of my article. This is not a catalog of Peterson’s political positions. It is a catalog of his crankery and incompetence.

And I did cover his racism in respect to that…

See my entire bit about his “shaking sticks” argument; and the whole section about Nazism; and my digs at his race-position with his dream for a “white man’s paradise,” and “identity” politics that are “exclusively white male or pro-white-male.”

However, if you know of any good debunking videos that specifically address his race baiting and race politics, share them here and if they are indeed good, I’ll paste them in.

Otherwise, if you are looking for articles about racism and white privilege, see my “racism” category (dropdown menu, top right).

Every single thing you just said is either irrelevant (it addresses nothing I wrote whatsoever) or already refuted by the evidence I cite and thus effects no defense.

That you don’t notice either is disturbing.