Comments on: Robyn Faith Walsh and the Gospels as Literature https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609 Announcing appearances, publications, and analysis of questions historical, philosophical, and political by author, philosopher, and historian Richard Carrier. Sat, 02 May 2026 18:50:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-44013 Sat, 02 May 2026 18:50:00 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-44013 In reply to B N.

Not that I am aware of. The arguments tend to be bad, not good.

I suspect it’s authentic. I discuss this in Obsolete Paradigm.

]]>
By: B N https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-43999 Sat, 02 May 2026 00:01:05 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-43999 In reply to Richard Carrier.

Are there any good arguments for why 1 Peter is not authentic?

]]>
By: Alejandro Servetto https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35744 Sat, 11 Feb 2023 03:00:07 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35744 In reply to Charles McGuyer.

or click on it with the scroll wheel of your mouse

]]>
By: Philip M Toner https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35667 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:30:38 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35667 In reply to Richard Carrier.

In your reply you linked to a write-up you did on Atwill- thanks for that

]]>
By: Philip M Toner https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35666 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:29:13 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35666 In reply to Richard Carrier.

Thanks for your response, I appreciate your time

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35664 Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:14:15 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35664 In reply to Nathan Myers.

Correct. It was given a fake description in the Middle Ages. It is now known by experts not to depict anything from the Bible but the Imperial Roman family. It also does not depict any bakers. And it has no connection whatever to the Tomb of the Baker in Rome. Nor does it support any of the other tinfoil hat here being linked to it.

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35662 Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:11:54 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35662 In reply to P J.

Which were all fakes. And the fake designation of this gem was another act of hucksterism.

Also, it wasn’t in “a shipment of artifacts.” Its origin is unknown (believed to have been received in France in a payment from Byzantium at some unknown time). What you mean is, it first is mentioned in an inventory of a French royal treasury that included many mundane treasures as well (just gems and precious metals), and a plethora of bogus relics besides.

]]>
By: P J https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35660 Sun, 15 Jan 2023 22:22:31 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35660 It was in a shipment of artifacts labeled “Relics of Christ” that included the Crown of Thorns and the Image of Edessa.

]]>
By: Nathan Myers https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35659 Sun, 15 Jan 2023 20:13:52 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35659 Just to be clear, Richard… You don’t argue that nobody catalogged the thing as ““Joseph’s Triumph at the Court of the Pharaoh”, but rather just that it is batshit to conclude anything from the mis-catalogging?

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22609#comment-35657 Sun, 15 Jan 2023 18:43:45 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22609#comment-35657 In reply to Kumar writer (@Kumar_writer).

I don’t believe there is any existential risk. But there are real risks; and we ought to be preparing for and attending to them. In other words, AI will create annoying problems (it already is); and these will escalate into increasingly substantial harms. But it’s not going to destroy civilization or anything.

This is no different than any other technology. Every new drug or plastic or system poses possible global risks we should be concerned to prepare for and attend to; even the science of indoor gas stoves is telling as an example of the point; the history of leaded gasoline, likewise; and so on.

So, bad things will happen if we don’t take this threat seriously; but that is not the same thing as wiping out or even collapsing civilization (much less the human race, even less “all life on Earth”). One needs to attenuate their concerns to reality.

See:

]]>