Lol. I don’t know Hoopla well enough to know how it paginates. But it’s fine because you give a specific enough quote that it can be found by text search and that’s all I need (indeed it’s better than a page number anyway). That’s the right way to report.

thanks. it seems hoopla is numbering the pages differently or just sucking at reporting them. (or I suppose i was up late reading. theres always that angle too ;))

ok thanks for pointing me in that direction. Im reading it from Hoopla. sometimes the page numbers get messed up.

That’s p. 140. But thanks. That is already on the Errata page, so you can check that first next time.

Yes, you can search my blog (box top right margin) for Errata Obsolete and find:

Errata for Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus

And that one isn’t on it! So, good catch. Thanks. I just added it. It’s p. 118 not 210, so ironically there’s a typo in your typo report! 🙂

I know you have an errata blog page for Historicity. I don’t know if theres one for Paradigm. But heads up, I just stumbled on a minor typo – page 210, in regards to Q and John Kloppenburg, he “sets the probably” -> probability.

There’s no evidence for that theory about what Josephus said. The evidence indicates he never mentioned Jesus at all.

No French editions of my works exist yet. But I want to create them someday. If that ever happens, it will be announced here and on all my social media.

As ancient texts are very easy to falsify, this added weight to the myth and the construction of Christianity. It’s amazing how small details can make a big difference. But in addition to becoming aware, by dissecting the writings, of the fabrication of the Gospels and the minimal probability of the existence of our good old friend, it’s confusing, but it’s worth the detour.

PS: Is your book available in French? I would be delighted to get my hands on it. Thank you in advance.