Comments on: Strange Notions: Questioning the Historicity of Jesus https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573 Announcing appearances, publications, and analysis of questions historical, philosophical, and political by author, philosopher, and historian Richard Carrier. Wed, 23 Jul 2025 22:07:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10351 Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:15:06 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10351 In reply to James van Luik.

I’ve only discussed Thomas Brodie (as an Irish and Catholic doubter of historicity). Unless that’s who you mean?

]]>
By: James van Luik https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10350 Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:29:46 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10350 Dear Dr. Carrier,

I am writing off the topic above. You mentioned in one of your talks a former catholic priest whom you praised as a theologian who had serious doubts of the Jesus scholarship similar to yours. I believe he was originally Irish and moved to the US and finally may have retired to Florida. He remained a Christian. I have listened to him on several occasions via the internet but somehow I managed to lose his name and internet programs His name was something like Classass perhaps.He always presented his arguments in a patient and scholarly way. I would appreciate your help in this matter.

Yours Sincerely,
James van Luik

PS I saw you on a program with Victor J. Stenger, recently died. He was a colleague of mine, much missed.
Professor Emeritus
Philosophy of Science

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10348 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:59:17 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10348 In reply to Kerry Shirts.

Thanks for the kind words. It’s good to know.

]]>
By: Kerry Shirts https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10347 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:22:32 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10347 Richard I am new to the Bayes Theorem idea. Since reading both your newest books I am, of course, now seriously much more interested in it! Very stimulating books to read. Enormous efforts, which I appreciate. Your reviews here are outstanding in helping the rest of us get the feel, as it were, for Bayes Theorem and using it on historical issues. NICE. I know it is a lot of work, but this is a good fight and I also want to simply know what the probability of the truth is and where it lies. I have darn near printed off your entire section of reviews here along with the comments and its a HUGE book! I can take it with me everywhere I go. Thanks again, and don’t stop. If I end up asking dumb questions forgive me. Now that I am learning Bayes, I have a lot of friends who are asking me tough questions and some I have no idea how to answer. Some I think are misunderstanding Bayes, and your blogs here are very helpful! I also have several of your books on my Kindle and enjoy reading you and the other fellows who “hang out” with you in their articles in Loftus’s books – Lol! You’re analysis are a breath of fresh air.

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10346 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:56:57 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10346 In reply to paarsurrey.

On what? Islam? Far more than you have on Taoism or Scientology I’m willing to bet. So why aren’t you a Taoist or a Scientologist?

]]>
By: paarsurrey https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10345 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:24:54 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10345 @Richard Carrier : April 28, 2014 at 8:35 am

So you have not done any personal research on it.

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10344 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:32:56 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10344 In reply to paarsurrey.

Yes, I have read the Quran. I am sorry to say that it is predominately a dull and derivative treatise written by a barbaric and ignorant people. Like most holy books from over a thousand years ago.

Anything that thinks it’s nice to force anyone (much less mere nonbelievers) to drink boiling water (6.70) is pretty much morally bankrupt from the word go. Evil in the Quran.

]]>
By: Richard Carrier https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10343 Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:35:37 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10343 In reply to paarsurrey.

Right now I’m told the key text is Robert Spencer’s Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam’s Obscure Origins (2012). There are others. I’ve not even looked at this, or any of the arguments, and don’t have the skillset to evaluate the question independently, so I can’t vouch for whether this is a good challenge or crank.

]]>
By: paarsurrey https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10342 Wed, 23 Apr 2014 23:40:51 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10342 @ Richard Carrier

A little question.

Have you read Quran?

I am asking this because you have generalized your experience with Christianity or Judaism to Islam; in your article and in your reply comments.

Thanks and regards

]]>
By: paarsurrey https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/4573#comment-10341 Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:32:26 +0000 http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/?p=4573#comment-10341 “I am aware there are challenges to the historicity of Mohammad”

What challenges are there on the historicity of Muhammad? Please elaborate.

Regards

]]>