fine tuning Archives • Richard Carrier Blogs https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/category/fine-tuning Announcing appearances, publications, and analysis of questions historical, philosophical, and political by author, philosopher, and historian Richard Carrier. Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:44:27 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 https://i0.wp.com/www.richardcarrier.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-richard6ico.jpg?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 fine tuning Archives • Richard Carrier Blogs https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/category/fine-tuning 32 32 113344482 The Utter Destruction of the Fine Tuning Argument https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/35831 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/35831#comments Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:07:38 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=35831 Christopher Hitchens rightly said the argument from fine tuning is the best argument theists have, but only because it requires thought to figure out why it’s bullshit (whereas most Christian apologetics is obvious bullshit from the first moment you hear it). Because it is actually a really bad argument. Here I will explain this and […]

The post The Utter Destruction of the Fine Tuning Argument appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/35831/feed 52 35831
Ross Douthat’s Worst Argument for God https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33451 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33451#comments Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:00:40 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=33451 I’ve written before about the recent decline of Christian apologetics (e.g. Addressing the New Christian Apologetics and Ben Shapiro’s Worst Argument for God and Another Two ‘Best’ Arguments for God?)—a trend that is illustrated by the enthusiastic revival of such antiquated and bumbling arguments as Undesigned Coincidences and Thomism: The Bogus Science. Ross Douthat of […]

The post Ross Douthat’s Worst Argument for God appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/33451/feed 37 33451
Boyce and Swenson’s Theological Argument against Multiverse Theory https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/25610 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/25610#comments Fri, 03 Nov 2023 15:50:35 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=25610 In 2020, Christian philosophers Kenneth Boyce and Philip Swenson presented a thesis at a conference, which has yet to appear under peer-review (though a version is in review), arguing that “fine tuning” is actually evidence against a multiverse. This is strange because it is most definitely the other way around. Consequently, a patron funded my […]

The post Boyce and Swenson’s Theological Argument against Multiverse Theory appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/25610/feed 33 25610
Another Two ‘Best’ Arguments for God? https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/24145 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/24145#comments Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:12:50 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=24145 Last time I analyzed YouTube’s “best” argument for God: Ben Shapiro’s, which tops the YouTube “influence” list with six million views. I also briefed a really terrible argument for God second on that list by Jordan Peterson, at under a million views. Nothing else even reached a hundred thousand views. But when I took “best” […]

The post Another Two ‘Best’ Arguments for God? appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/24145/feed 22 24145
Three Common Confusions of Creationists https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22632 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22632#comments Mon, 27 Mar 2023 23:24:34 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=22632 In response to some recent queries, and being reminded of some things in an old slideshow of mine, which accompanied a talk I gave in Humboldt some years ago (which was supposed to be my opening for a debate with a creationist; but the creationist bailed as soon as they heard I’d be the one […]

The post Three Common Confusions of Creationists appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/22632/feed 11 22632
Why the Fine Tuning Argument Proves God Does Not Exist https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/20661 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/20661#comments Fri, 24 Jun 2022 01:16:16 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=20661 In Bayesian Counter-Apologetics I outlined why the Fine Tuning Argument actually disproves the existence of God. And I didn’t make that up. What I outline there was independently corroborated twice by the peer-reviewed research of multiple experts (see On the Bayesian Reversal of the Fine Tuning Argument). And I’ve formally laid this all out in […]

The post Why the Fine Tuning Argument Proves God Does Not Exist appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/20661/feed 90 20661
Justin Brierley on the Science of Existence https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19739 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19739#comments Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:59:05 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=19739 Does science prove God? It is painfully ironic that Justin Brierley opens his chapter on this topic with a false quote from a scientist (p. 22). This common Christian failure to do the work to ascertain what scientists have actually said about these subjects explains every failure to get any of the pertinent facts right […]

The post Justin Brierley on the Science of Existence appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19739/feed 13 19739
A Hidden Fallacy in the Fine Tuning Argument https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19363 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19363#comments Sun, 30 Jan 2022 07:46:37 +0000 https://www.sna.unr.mybluehost.me/?p=19363 One of the most popular and persuasive arguments for theism is the so-called Fine-Tuning Argument. But there is a singular fallacy in it that I think usually gets overlooked. There are of course actually many fallacies in it, but those have been well-explored (hence I’ve written on this subject often enough and there is a […]

The post A Hidden Fallacy in the Fine Tuning Argument appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19363/feed 30 19363
PragerU to The Internet: Science Proves God, You Pinko Commies! https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/16414 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/16414#comments Thu, 05 Mar 2020 19:00:38 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=16414 PragerU claims in multiple conservative propaganda videos that science has proved God exists and atheists should just go stuff it already. I’ll tackle this nonsense today—just to be useful, since most of PragerU’s critiques online target its lies, fallacies, and distortions about history and politics. Which is great. But I feel like the God thing […]

The post PragerU to The Internet: Science Proves God, You Pinko Commies! appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/16414/feed 24 16414
The Carrier-Marshall Debate: My Seventh Reply https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/15419 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/15419#comments Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:32:09 +0000 https://www.richardcarrier.info/?p=15419 Christian historian Dr. Wallace Marshall and I are debating whether or not enough evidence points to the existence of a god. For background and format, and Dr. Wallace’s opening statement, see entry one; for the rest, our index. We are now discussing what I call the Argument from Indifference against the existence of God. Marshall […]

The post The Carrier-Marshall Debate: My Seventh Reply appeared first on Richard Carrier Blogs.

]]>
https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/15419/feed 27 15419